The build script applies pcb.place coordinates from design.json, then runs the client auto layout, which scatters the parts again. On a 32-part mmWave relay board, the H1/H2 header pitch stopped being 600 mil and U3 landed where it intersects J2's plastic body in 3D, which 2D DRC cannot catch.

Recurring agent failure issue in easyeda-eprj3-skill (easyeda)

easyeda-eprj3-skill (easyeda)ECADAgent failureMedium confidence

What engineers report

A recurring agent failure problem in easyeda-eprj3-skill (easyeda) that mostly hits the electrical engineer.

Failure pattern: validation / failure

Analyst note

From the Grok pain-radar digests, Nov 8-9 2026 (Nov 8 8:41 AM ET through Nov 9 6:41 AM ET digests plus the Haitch editions). Verified live 2026-11-09: issue/PR read; title and state confirmed.

What it costs a team

Modeled annual cost

$30,000

For a team of 5

Prototype delay

3 days

Modeled schedule slip per occurrence

Time lost

240 min

Per engineer per month, about 1 incidents

How the cost is modeled

240 min/month × 5 engineers × 12 months = 240 hours × $125/hour = $30,000

A modeled estimate with medium confidence. Swap in your own team size and loaded rate to size it for your team.

Engineering tools that address it

No engineering tool profile lists this error yet. Browse tools that connect to easyeda-eprj3-skill (easyeda).

Evidence

  1. 1easyeda/easyeda-eprj3-skill Issue #6: [Feature/Bug] pcb.place 在客户端自动布局时被覆盖:build.js 先移动再 autoLayout,无法固定关键器件位置github.com

More recurring errors in easyeda-eprj3-skill (easyeda)

See all 2 easyeda-eprj3-skill (easyeda) errors

Sourced from public community reports. Costs and delays are modeled estimates, not measurements. Know a better source or a fix? Tell us at hello@productflo.io.