A contributor reproduced EasyEDA Pro 3.2.209 returning an undefined result from rebuildCopperRegion() after pad, via, track or pour edits in the same session. The bridge already refused ambiguous results; now it also tells the caller about the editor's save, close and reopen workaround, and says the project, the pour IDs and the copper geometry have to be checked independently before trying again.

Recurring agent failure issue in easyeda-mcp-pro (oaslananka)

easyeda-mcp-pro (oaslananka)ECADAgent failureMedium confidence

What engineers report

A recurring agent failure problem in easyeda-mcp-pro (oaslananka) that mostly hits the electrical engineer.

Failure pattern: validation / geometry

Analyst note

From the Grok pain-radar digests, Nov 10-11 2026 (Nov 10 8:41 AM ET through Nov 11 7:41 AM ET digests plus the Haitch editions). Verified live 2026-11-11: issue/PR read; title and state confirmed.

What it costs a team

Modeled annual cost

$30,000

For a team of 5

Prototype delay

3 days

Modeled schedule slip per occurrence

Time lost

240 min

Per engineer per month, about 1 incidents

How the cost is modeled

240 min/month × 5 engineers × 12 months = 240 hours × $125/hour = $30,000

A modeled estimate with medium confidence. Swap in your own team size and loaded rate to size it for your team.

Engineering tools that address it

No engineering tool profile lists this error yet. Browse tools that connect to easyeda-mcp-pro (oaslananka).

Evidence

  1. 1oaslananka/easyeda-mcp-pro PR #1008: fix(pcb): explain recovery after uncertain copper rebuild (#480)github.com

More recurring errors in easyeda-mcp-pro (oaslananka)

See all 51 easyeda-mcp-pro (oaslananka) errors

Sourced from public community reports. Costs and delays are modeled estimates, not measurements. Know a better source or a fix? Tell us at hello@productflo.io.