The EasyEDA Pro beta API can return stale objects or fail for copper pours an agent creates, so a pour outline can look like finished copper when no fill exists. The fix cross-checks every pour against a separate listing of filled regions by ID and geometry signature and fails closed on any mismatch. Agent writes into an EDA tool need a second, independent read to confirm they happened.

Recurring agent failure issue in easyeda-mcp-pro (oaslananka)

easyeda-mcp-pro (oaslananka)ECADAgent failureMedium confidence

What engineers report

A recurring agent failure problem in easyeda-mcp-pro (oaslananka) that mostly hits the electrical engineer.

Failure pattern: agent / silent failure

Analyst note

From the Grok pain-radar digests, Nov 11-12 2026 (Nov 11 8:41 AM ET through Nov 12 5:41 AM ET digests plus the Haitch editions). Verified live 2026-11-12: issue/PR read; title and state confirmed.

What it costs a team

Modeled annual cost

$30,000

For a team of 5

Prototype delay

3 days

Modeled schedule slip per occurrence

Time lost

240 min

Per engineer per month, about 1 incidents

How the cost is modeled

240 min/month × 5 engineers × 12 months = 240 hours × $125/hour = $30,000

A modeled estimate with medium confidence. Swap in your own team size and loaded rate to size it for your team.

Engineering tools that address it

No engineering tool profile lists this error yet. Browse tools that connect to easyeda-mcp-pro (oaslananka).

Evidence

  1. 1oaslananka/easyeda-mcp-pro PR #1028: fix(pcb): verify native Pour-to-Poured association before accepting coppergithub.com

More recurring errors in easyeda-mcp-pro (oaslananka)

See all 51 easyeda-mcp-pro (oaslananka) errors

Sourced from public community reports. Costs and delays are modeled estimates, not measurements. Know a better source or a fix? Tell us at hello@productflo.io.