Run in a real project, the agentic test hit three bugs. The proof step called itself, but the call only runs when kicad-cli is present, so a machine without kicad-cli never hits it and the test passed. Once the KiCad proof ran, it flagged pin names drawn over each other because the symbol body was a fixed 12.7 mm. The handoff stage always created board 1 and failed in any project that already had one.

Recurring agent failure issue in hardwareDesignerTemplate (AMuszkat)

hardwareDesignerTemplate (AMuszkat)ECADAgent failureMedium confidence

What engineers report

A recurring agent failure problem in hardwareDesignerTemplate (AMuszkat) that mostly hits the electrical engineer.

Failure pattern: agent / failure

Analyst note

From the Grok pain-radar digests, Nov 9-10 2026 (Nov 9 7:41 AM ET through Nov 10 7:41 AM ET digests plus the Haitch editions). Verified live 2026-11-10: issue/PR read; title and state confirmed.

What it costs a team

Modeled annual cost

$30,000

For a team of 5

Prototype delay

3 days

Modeled schedule slip per occurrence

Time lost

240 min

Per engineer per month, about 1 incidents

How the cost is modeled

240 min/month × 5 engineers × 12 months = 240 hours × $125/hour = $30,000

A modeled estimate with medium confidence. Swap in your own team size and loaded rate to size it for your team.

Engineering tools that address it

No engineering tool profile lists this error yet. Browse tools that connect to hardwareDesignerTemplate (AMuszkat).

Evidence

  1. 1AMuszkat/hardwareDesignerTemplate PR #2: tests: agentic_test.py passes with kicad-cli and in a project that has boardsgithub.com

More recurring errors in hardwareDesignerTemplate (AMuszkat)

See all 2 hardwareDesignerTemplate (AMuszkat) errors

Sourced from public community reports. Costs and delays are modeled estimates, not measurements. Know a better source or a fix? Tell us at hello@productflo.io.