The lamina docs check accepts tool names and parameters but not result fields, so naming missing_models in the guide failed CI. Agents read these field names, so the docs should be able to name them. The proposal is a JSON outputSchema per MCP tool.

Recurring agent failure issue in lamina (meraworks)

lamina (meraworks)ECADAgent failureMedium confidence

What engineers report

A recurring agent failure problem in lamina (meraworks) that mostly hits the electrical engineer.

Failure pattern: agent / failure

Analyst note

From the Grok pain-radar digests, Nov 9-10 2026 (Nov 9 7:41 AM ET through Nov 10 7:41 AM ET digests plus the Haitch editions). Verified live 2026-11-10: issue/PR read; title and state confirmed.

What it costs a team

Modeled annual cost

$30,000

For a team of 5

Prototype delay

3 days

Modeled schedule slip per occurrence

Time lost

240 min

Per engineer per month, about 1 incidents

How the cost is modeled

240 min/month × 5 engineers × 12 months = 240 hours × $125/hour = $30,000

A modeled estimate with medium confidence. Swap in your own team size and loaded rate to size it for your team.

Engineering tools that address it

No engineering tool profile lists this error yet. Browse tools that connect to lamina (meraworks).

Evidence

  1. 1meraworks/lamina Issue #23: Docs check does not know the fields of tool results (e.g. `missing_models` of `status`)github.com

More recurring errors in lamina (meraworks)

See all 3 lamina (meraworks) errors

Sourced from public community reports. Costs and delays are modeled estimates, not measurements. Know a better source or a fix? Tell us at hello@productflo.io.