KiCad and LCSC footprints use different zero orientations. Without new offsets, the DRV8874 motor drivers and INA241 current sensors would have gone on turned 90 degrees and the TLV9001 turned 180, every pin on the wrong pad. JLCPCB also mirrors bottom-side parts, so the wall board's Q1 and D1 sat 180 degrees off on every panel copy.

Recurring agent failure issue in MicrasPCB (Team-Micras)

MicrasPCB (Team-Micras)ECADAgent failureMedium confidence

What engineers report

A recurring agent failure problem in MicrasPCB (Team-Micras) that mostly hits the electrical engineer.

Failure pattern: validation / failure

Analyst note

From the Grok pain-radar digests, Nov 8-9 2026 (Nov 8 8:41 AM ET through Nov 9 6:41 AM ET digests plus the Haitch editions). Verified live 2026-11-09: issue/PR read; title and state confirmed.

What it costs a team

Modeled annual cost

$30,000

For a team of 5

Prototype delay

3 days

Modeled schedule slip per occurrence

Time lost

240 min

Per engineer per month, about 1 incidents

How the cost is modeled

240 min/month × 5 engineers × 12 months = 240 hours × $125/hour = $30,000

A modeled estimate with medium confidence. Swap in your own team size and loaded rate to size it for your team.

Engineering tools that address it

No engineering tool profile lists this error yet. Browse tools that connect to MicrasPCB (Team-Micras).

Evidence

  1. 1Team-Micras/MicrasPCB PR #39: 🐛 Get the board ready for JLCPCB Economic assembly: placement rotations and the CT-1515 status LEDsgithub.com

More recurring errors in MicrasPCB (Team-Micras)

See all 2 MicrasPCB (Team-Micras) errors

Sourced from public community reports. Costs and delays are modeled estimates, not measurements. Know a better source or a fix? Tell us at hello@productflo.io.