Moving the design from atopile to KiCad turned up datasheet errors carried over unchanged: the FB divider would have driven the 5 V output toward 12 V, EN sat on the CH224K's active-low PG and held the buck off, and R10 dissipated 161 mW in a 100 mW part. The author runs ERC, schematic parity and datasheet rules in CI and still says do not order this board yet.

Recurring agent failure issue in milsblo (arunderwood)

milsblo (arunderwood)ECADAgent failureMedium confidence

What engineers report

A recurring agent failure problem in milsblo (arunderwood) that mostly hits the electrical engineer.

Failure pattern: validation / failure

Analyst note

From the Grok pain-radar digests, Nov 9-10 2026 (Nov 9 7:41 AM ET through Nov 10 7:41 AM ET digests plus the Haitch editions). Verified live 2026-11-10: issue/PR read; title and state confirmed.

What it costs a team

Modeled annual cost

$30,000

For a team of 5

Prototype delay

3 days

Modeled schedule slip per occurrence

Time lost

240 min

Per engineer per month, about 1 incidents

How the cost is modeled

240 min/month × 5 engineers × 12 months = 240 hours × $125/hour = $30,000

A modeled estimate with medium confidence. Swap in your own team size and loaded rate to size it for your team.

Engineering tools that address it

No engineering tool profile lists this error yet. Browse tools that connect to milsblo (arunderwood).

Evidence

  1. 1arunderwood/milsblo PR #4: Move the design to KiCad and fix datasheet errorsgithub.com

Sourced from public community reports. Costs and delays are modeled estimates, not measurements. Know a better source or a fix? Tell us at hello@productflo.io.