The author wrote five footprints straight from manufacturer drawings, logging what was read, derived and assumed for each. Two differ from KiCad's stock footprints: the HRO TYPE-C-31-M-12 in KiCad cites an older drawing with signal pads 1.45 mm long where Rev A gives a different length, and the Omron B3U-1000P switch differs too. The library footprint and the current datasheet are two sources for one part, with no link telling which revision the library used.

Recurring agent failure issue in netsmith (noahdgrant)

netsmith (noahdgrant)ECADAgent failureMedium confidence

What engineers report

A recurring agent failure problem in netsmith (noahdgrant) that mostly hits the electrical engineer.

Failure pattern: validation / failure

Analyst note

From the Grok pain-radar digests, Nov 10-11 2026 (Nov 10 8:41 AM ET through Nov 11 7:41 AM ET digests plus the Haitch editions). Verified live 2026-11-11: issue/PR read; title and state confirmed.

What it costs a team

Modeled annual cost

$30,000

For a team of 5

Prototype delay

3 days

Modeled schedule slip per occurrence

Time lost

240 min

Per engineer per month, about 1 incidents

How the cost is modeled

240 min/month × 5 engineers × 12 months = 240 hours × $125/hour = $30,000

A modeled estimate with medium confidence. Swap in your own team size and loaded rate to size it for your team.

Engineering tools that address it

No engineering tool profile lists this error yet. Browse tools that connect to netsmith (noahdgrant).

Evidence

  1. 1noahdgrant/netsmith PR #337: feat(pcb): footprints written from the maker's drawing for five parts (ADR 0097, step 3)github.com

More recurring errors in netsmith (noahdgrant)

See all 16 netsmith (noahdgrant) errors

Sourced from public community reports. Costs and delays are modeled estimates, not measurements. Know a better source or a fix? Tell us at hello@productflo.io.