On a 257-part import, C65 and C66 were missing, so the designator assigner numbered the rest in order and C67 to C107 became C65 to C105 on every layout sync, undoing manual board fixes 41 times in one import thread. Schematic identity and board identity drifted apart with nothing to hold them together.

Recurring agent failure issue in pcb (embedrapp)

pcb (embedrapp)ECADAgent failureMedium confidence

What engineers report

A recurring agent failure problem in pcb (embedrapp) that mostly hits the electrical engineer.

Failure pattern: validation / failure

Analyst note

From the Grok pain-radar digests, Nov 9-10 2026 (Nov 9 7:41 AM ET through Nov 10 7:41 AM ET digests plus the Haitch editions). Verified live 2026-11-10: issue/PR read; title and state confirmed.

What it costs a team

Modeled annual cost

$30,000

For a team of 5

Prototype delay

3 days

Modeled schedule slip per occurrence

Time lost

240 min

Per engineer per month, about 1 incidents

How the cost is modeled

240 min/month × 5 engineers × 12 months = 240 hours × $125/hour = $30,000

A modeled estimate with medium confidence. Swap in your own team size and loaded rate to size it for your team.

Engineering tools that address it

No engineering tool profile lists this error yet. Browse tools that connect to pcb (embedrapp).

Evidence

  1. 1embedrapp/pcb PR #5: Keep a top-level component's refdes-shaped name as its designatorgithub.com

Sourced from public community reports. Costs and delays are modeled estimates, not measurements. Know a better source or a fix? Tell us at hello@productflo.io.