In this datasheet-to-KiCad footprint pipeline, tab packages are the weakest family. SOT-89 reads with the lead span read 10x or 2x too long, or the terminal length cut by 10 or 2, still built footprints with moved pads. The sweep went from 6 such builds to 0 after a new check that holds any read where the reach past the body is over 4x the longest foot. The benchmark was also wrong. A part with no symbol was counted as "built wrong" when the release check would never release it at all.

Recurring agent failure issue in PCBLIVINGLIBRARY (oliBrowne)

PCBLIVINGLIBRARY (oliBrowne)ECADAgent failureMedium confidence

What engineers report

A recurring agent failure problem in PCBLIVINGLIBRARY (oliBrowne) that mostly hits the electrical engineer.

Failure pattern: agent / failure

Analyst note

From the Grok pain-radar digests, Nov 11-12 2026 (Nov 11 8:41 AM ET through Nov 12 5:41 AM ET digests plus the Haitch editions). Verified live 2026-11-12: issue/PR read; title and state confirmed.

What it costs a team

Modeled annual cost

$30,000

For a team of 5

Prototype delay

3 days

Modeled schedule slip per occurrence

Time lost

240 min

Per engineer per month, about 1 incidents

How the cost is modeled

240 min/month × 5 engineers × 12 months = 240 hours × $125/hour = $30,000

A modeled estimate with medium confidence. Swap in your own team size and loaded rate to size it for your team.

Engineering tools that address it

No engineering tool profile lists this error yet. Browse tools that connect to PCBLIVINGLIBRARY (oliBrowne).

Evidence

  1. 1oliBrowne/PCBLIVINGLIBRARY PR #238: Tab packages: SOT-89 gets KiCad's checked land, a lead span read far too long is held; no-symbol parts count as not builtgithub.com

More recurring errors in PCBLIVINGLIBRARY (oliBrowne)

See all 14 PCBLIVINGLIBRARY (oliBrowne) errors

Sourced from public community reports. Costs and delays are modeled estimates, not measurements. Know a better source or a fix? Tell us at hello@productflo.io.