An agent-built PR swaps 439 generic parts for exact manufacturer identities and adds 95 new capacitor MPNs. Values, pins, nets and footprints are unchanged, and every generator and ERC check passes. Still, 8 tests fail because retained studies and reports were tied to the old inputs: a protection study needs engineering reassessment, an audit report is stale, a layout MPN is stale. The PR is on HOLD because the change alters netlist metadata that board receipts depend on. The C0603 land pattern is still open against both Murata and KEMET recommendations.

Recurring agent failure issue in zudo-osc-hole-field (Takazudo)

zudo-osc-hole-field (Takazudo)ECADAgent failureMedium confidence

What engineers report

A recurring agent failure problem in zudo-osc-hole-field (Takazudo) that mostly hits the electrical engineer.

Failure pattern: agent / failure

Analyst note

From the Grok pain-radar digests, Nov 11-12 2026 (Nov 11 8:41 AM ET through Nov 12 5:41 AM ET digests plus the Haitch editions). Verified live 2026-11-12: issue/PR read; title and state confirmed.

What it costs a team

Modeled annual cost

$30,000

For a team of 5

Prototype delay

3 days

Modeled schedule slip per occurrence

Time lost

240 min

Per engineer per month, about 1 incidents

How the cost is modeled

240 min/month × 5 engineers × 12 months = 240 hours × $125/hour = $30,000

A modeled estimate with medium confidence. Swap in your own team size and loaded rate to size it for your team.

Engineering tools that address it

No engineering tool profile lists this error yet. Browse tools that connect to zudo-osc-hole-field (Takazudo).

Evidence

  1. 1Takazudo/zudo-osc-hole-field PR #334: feat(parts): install reviewed parts-439-with-324 identity packet (#21, #324)github.com

More recurring errors in zudo-osc-hole-field (Takazudo)

See all 3 zudo-osc-hole-field (Takazudo) errors

Sourced from public community reports. Costs and delays are modeled estimates, not measurements. Know a better source or a fix? Tell us at hello@productflo.io.