A CAD interference check reported a PCB sitting in the open cavity of a watch case as a 750 mm3 clash, the board's whole volume. Suppressing the rim fillet made it go away. The fine fillet mesh pushed the case past 80,000 triangles, a shortcut check bailed out, a shifted retry classified the board as inside, and the membership check returned no opinion above 60,000 triangles, which the caller counted as a pass.

Recurring agent failure issue in solidcraft (tangency-labs)

solidcraft (tangency-labs)MCADAgent failureMedium confidence

What engineers report

A recurring agent failure problem in solidcraft (tangency-labs) that mostly hits the mechanical designer.

Failure pattern: validation / geometry

Analyst note

From the Grok pain-radar digests, Nov 10-11 2026 (Nov 10 8:41 AM ET through Nov 11 7:41 AM ET digests plus the Haitch editions). Verified live 2026-11-11: issue/PR read; title and state confirmed.

What it costs a team

Modeled annual cost

$30,000

For a team of 5

Prototype delay

3 days

Modeled schedule slip per occurrence

Time lost

240 min

Per engineer per month, about 1 incidents

How the cost is modeled

240 min/month × 5 engineers × 12 months = 240 hours × $125/hour = $30,000

A modeled estimate with medium confidence. Swap in your own team size and loaded rate to size it for your team.

Engineering tools that address it

No engineering tool profile lists this error yet. Browse tools that connect to solidcraft (tangency-labs).

Evidence

  1. 1tangency-labs/solidcraft PR #3702: Interference: a board in the cavity of a case with a rounded rim is not inside itgithub.com

More recurring errors in solidcraft (tangency-labs)

See all 40 solidcraft (tangency-labs) errors

Sourced from public community reports. Costs and delays are modeled estimates, not measurements. Know a better source or a fix? Tell us at hello@productflo.io.