Step-by-step assembly playback could show an arriving part crossing an earlier one while the final pose was clear. The fix checks the actual insertion path from offset to seat against parts in install order, bound to hashes of the guide, model and meshes, and missing or stale evidence fails visibly. A follow-up, #517, says the real collection now has 233 instances and can need 27,028 ordered pair checks.

Recurring agent failure issue in cad-agent (Valpatel)

cad-agent (Valpatel)VerificationAgent failureMedium confidence

What engineers report

A recurring agent failure problem in cad-agent (Valpatel) that mostly hits the hardware engineer.

Failure pattern: validation / failure

Analyst note

From the Grok pain-radar digests, Nov 10-11 2026 (Nov 10 8:41 AM ET through Nov 11 7:41 AM ET digests plus the Haitch editions). Verified live 2026-11-11: issue/PR read; title and state confirmed.

What it costs a team

Modeled annual cost

$30,000

For a team of 5

Prototype delay

3 days

Modeled schedule slip per occurrence

Time lost

240 min

Per engineer per month, about 1 incidents

How the cost is modeled

240 min/month × 5 engineers × 12 months = 240 hours × $125/hour = $30,000

A modeled estimate with medium confidence. Swap in your own team size and loaded rate to size it for your team.

Engineering tools that address it

No engineering tool profile lists this error yet. Browse tools that connect to cad-agent (Valpatel).

Evidence

  1. 1Valpatel/cad-agent PR #513: Validate finite assembly playback paths with the existing gategithub.com

More recurring errors in cad-agent (Valpatel)

See all 22 cad-agent (Valpatel) errors

Sourced from public community reports. Costs and delays are modeled estimates, not measurements. Know a better source or a fix? Tell us at hello@productflo.io.