EmbedBench
LLM embedded system development across 3 hardware platforms and 9 electronic components, with 126 cases scored by pass@1 plus cross-platform porting tasks.
Summary rewritten from the vendor site because the catalog version did not match it.
What it does and how it connects
EmbedBench is the benchmark behind EmbedAgent, a paradigm for testing large language models in embedded system development through three simulated real-world roles: Embedded System Programmer, Architect, and Integrator. It consists of 126 manually constructed cases covering 9 electronic components across 3 hardware platforms, each with a task description, a reference solution, and automated correctness validation.
The Programmer setting gives the model a task description and a circuit schematic and asks for Arduino code. The Architect setting gives only the task description and asks the model to design the circuit and write the code. The Integrator setting gives a schematic and code for one hardware platform and asks the model to migrate the design and code to another platform.
Correctness is checked with a hardware-driven evaluation approach: the behavior of virtual hardware in the Wokwi environment is monitored in real time. The paper reports DeepSeek-R1 at only 55.6 percent pass@1 with schematic information and 50.0 percent when generating schematics itself, and cross-platform migration as the weakest area, with ESP-IDF the hardest target at 29.4 percent pass@1 for the best model. Retrieval augmentation and compiler feedback lift DeepSeek-R1 to 65.1 percent with correct schematics.
Alternatives
Compare side by side- EmbedEval
EmbedEval tests implicit embedded-firmware knowledge with 267 cases, while EmbedBench tests embedded development with 126 cases across 3 hardware platforms.
- llm-firmware-benchmark
llm-firmware-benchmark is a Node harness for firmware coding tasks with deterministic fixtures, while EmbedBench tests embedded development with 126 cases.
- Embedded-LLM study (MDPI)
The MDPI study evaluates 27 models on 8 ESP32 IoT scenarios by expert review, while EmbedBench tests embedded development with 126 cases.
- PCEval
PCEval tests physical computing with circuits and code in simulation, while EmbedBench tests embedded development with 126 cases.
Sources
Not verified
- Builder: the paper names nine authors; no builder organization was verified in the sources read
- License: no benchmark or code license was stated in the sources read
- Pricing: none stated
- Real user voices (no real linked post read for this page)
- Related Error Index entries (no matching entry verified)
- A public code repository or dataset (none was stated on the paper page read)
- The catalog's platform list (Arduino, ESP32, ESP-IDF, Pico, MicroPython), which the abstract does not enumerate
Last verified November 6, 2026. Listings are informational. The evidence score measures public, verifiable evidence and is not an endorsement or a compatibility claim.