EmbedEval
267 embedded-firmware cases (boot, ADC, PWM, DMA, ISR concurrency, device tree) where prompts state the goal and checks verify implicit hardware knowledge.
Summary rewritten from the vendor site because the catalog version did not match it.
What it does and how it connects
EmbedEval is an LLM embedded-domain knowledge probe that measures whether models possess the implicit domain knowledge to write safe embedded C code. It covers Zephyr RTOS, ESP-IDF, STM32 HAL, FreeRTOS, Linux kernel drivers, and Yocto recipes across 267 test cases (219 public and 48 private held-out), testing interrupt safety, cache coherency, DMA alignment, power management, and real-time constraints.
Unlike benchmarks that tell the model exactly what to do, EmbedEval states what to build but not how to make it safe: a prompt may ask for a DMA transfer with a completion callback without mentioning cache-line alignment, cache flush and invalidate, or a volatile completion flag. The README reports explicit prompts pass at about 95 percent while implicit prompts pass at about 60 percent, a 35 point gap it reads as benchmarks overestimating LLM capability in embedded domains.
The repository ships a live leaderboard on Hugging Face, a methodology document, and a CLI that runs the benchmark with L0 and L3 static checks and no Docker needed. The README's leaderboard table reports Sonnet 4.6 at 68.0 percent pass@1, Sonnet 5 at 67.0 percent, and Opus 5 at 61.8 percent, with DMA, ISR concurrency, and threading the weakest categories across models.
Alternatives
Compare side by side- EmbedBench
EmbedBench tests embedded development with 126 cases across 3 hardware platforms, while EmbedEval tests implicit embedded-firmware knowledge with 267 cases.
- llm-firmware-benchmark
llm-firmware-benchmark is a Node harness for firmware coding tasks with deterministic fixtures, while EmbedEval tests implicit embedded-firmware knowledge.
- Embedded-LLM study (MDPI)
The MDPI study evaluates 27 models on 8 ESP32 IoT scenarios by expert review, while EmbedEval tests implicit embedded-firmware knowledge with automated checks.
- PCEval
PCEval tests physical computing with circuits and code in simulation, while EmbedEval tests implicit embedded-firmware knowledge.
Sources
Not verified
- Pricing: none stated on the repo
- Real user voices (no real linked post read for this page)
- Related Error Index entries (no matching entry verified)
- A named individual builder beyond the Ecro repository owner
Last verified November 6, 2026. Listings are informational. The evidence score measures public, verifiable evidence and is not an endorsement or a compatibility claim.