When a multi-point net ends with a disconnected pad, the per-net log names the pad, but the end-of-run summary and both JSON summaries print pad ?. The log line itself says the final verdict lives in that summary. On a private 4-layer power board, 126 of 260 route logs from one 32-hour agent run had pad ? lines, including a QFN pin on U401, and the agent had to map coordinates back to pins by hand.

Recurring agent failure issue in KiCadRoutingTools (drandyhaas)

KiCadRoutingTools (drandyhaas)ECADAgent failureMedium confidence

What engineers report

A recurring agent failure problem in KiCadRoutingTools (drandyhaas) that mostly hits the electrical engineer.

Failure pattern: agent / failure

Analyst note

From the Grok pain-radar digests, Nov 9-10 2026 (Nov 9 7:41 AM ET through Nov 10 7:41 AM ET digests plus the Haitch editions). Verified live 2026-11-10: issue/PR read; title and state confirmed.

What it costs a team

Modeled annual cost

$30,000

For a team of 5

Prototype delay

3 days

Modeled schedule slip per occurrence

Time lost

240 min

Per engineer per month, about 1 incidents

How the cost is modeled

240 min/month × 5 engineers × 12 months = 240 hours × $125/hour = $30,000

A modeled estimate with medium confidence. Swap in your own team size and loaded rate to size it for your team.

Engineering tools that address it

No engineering tool profile lists this error yet. Browse tools that connect to KiCadRoutingTools (drandyhaas).

Evidence

  1. 1drandyhaas/KiCadRoutingTools Issue #1779: route.py's end-of-run summary prints `pad ?` for every open pad, though the pad number is knowngithub.com

More recurring errors in KiCadRoutingTools (drandyhaas)

See all 58 KiCadRoutingTools (drandyhaas) errors

Sourced from public community reports. Costs and delays are modeled estimates, not measurements. Know a better source or a fix? Tell us at hello@productflo.io.