Barocss BOM code starts each part at mass 0 and skips evaluation failures, so a failed part lands as a normal-looking row with 0 g, or drops out, and the total rolls up into the assembly. The panel shows the total and offers a purchase export. Source-inspected only; no real purchase or user harm was observed.

Recurring agent failure issue in barocss (barocss)

barocss (barocss)MCADAgent failureMedium confidence

What engineers report

A recurring agent failure problem in barocss (barocss) that mostly hits the mechanical designer.

Failure pattern: agent / failure

Analyst note

From the Grok pain-radar digests, Nov 9-10 2026 (Nov 9 7:41 AM ET through Nov 10 7:41 AM ET digests plus the Haitch editions). Verified live 2026-11-10: issue/PR read; title and state confirmed.

What it costs a team

Modeled annual cost

$30,000

For a team of 5

Prototype delay

3 days

Modeled schedule slip per occurrence

Time lost

240 min

Per engineer per month, about 1 incidents

How the cost is modeled

240 min/month × 5 engineers × 12 months = 240 hours × $125/hour = $30,000

A modeled estimate with medium confidence. Swap in your own team size and loaded rate to size it for your team.

Engineering tools that address it

No engineering tool profile lists this error yet. Browse tools that connect to barocss (barocss).

Evidence

  1. 1barocss/barocss Issue #2420: fix(cad-model): 일반 부품 평가 실패를 정상 BOM의 0 g·누락 행으로 확정하지 않도록 보강github.com

More recurring errors in barocss (barocss)

See all 6 barocss (barocss) errors

Sourced from public community reports. Costs and delays are modeled estimates, not measurements. Know a better source or a fix? Tell us at hello@productflo.io.