The issue behind PR #713: CAM refuses to post a tap because CAD models the hole the normal way, at tap-drill size, while the gouge check sweeps the tap at full major diameter. The only way through was to remodel the hole at the thread's major diameter, which makes the CAD wrong.

Recurring agent failure issue in Camcraft (NeoTech)

Camcraft (NeoTech)MCADAgent failureMedium confidence

What engineers report

A recurring agent failure problem in Camcraft (NeoTech) that mostly hits the mechanical designer.

Failure pattern: validation / failure

Analyst note

From the Grok pain-radar digests, Nov 10-11 2026 (Nov 10 8:41 AM ET through Nov 11 7:41 AM ET digests plus the Haitch editions). Verified live 2026-11-11: issue/PR read; title and state confirmed.

What it costs a team

Modeled annual cost

$30,000

For a team of 5

Prototype delay

3 days

Modeled schedule slip per occurrence

Time lost

240 min

Per engineer per month, about 1 incidents

How the cost is modeled

240 min/month × 5 engineers × 12 months = 240 hours × $125/hour = $30,000

A modeled estimate with medium confidence. Swap in your own team size and loaded rate to size it for your team.

Engineering tools that address it

No engineering tool profile lists this error yet. Browse tools that connect to Camcraft (NeoTech).

Evidence

  1. 1NeoTech/Camcraft Issue #266: Gouge check sweeps a tap at its full diameter, so a tap on a tap-drill-size hole is refusedgithub.com

More recurring errors in Camcraft (NeoTech)

See all 7 Camcraft (NeoTech) errors

Sourced from public community reports. Costs and delays are modeled estimates, not measurements. Know a better source or a fix? Tell us at hello@productflo.io.