Main was red on a test no CI job ran. The committed supply-capability report was last written Oct 31. Two commits on Nov 1 changed its inputs, one rewrote the power budget and one adopted new resistor and capacitor parts for Board B. The report's computed values turned out unchanged, only its two input hashes were stale, but nobody knew until someone ran the test by hand. The PR adds the gate to CI and the local pre-push script. A derived engineering report that can drift from its inputs with no alarm.

Recurring agent failure issue in zudo-pd (Takazudo)

zudo-pd (Takazudo)ECADAgent failureMedium confidence

What engineers report

A recurring agent failure problem in zudo-pd (Takazudo) that mostly hits the electrical engineer.

Failure pattern: agent / silent failure

Analyst note

From the Grok pain-radar digests, Nov 11-12 2026 (Nov 11 8:41 AM ET through Nov 12 5:41 AM ET digests plus the Haitch editions). Verified live 2026-11-12: issue/PR read; title and state confirmed.

What it costs a team

Modeled annual cost

$30,000

For a team of 5

Prototype delay

3 days

Modeled schedule slip per occurrence

Time lost

240 min

Per engineer per month, about 1 incidents

How the cost is modeled

240 min/month × 5 engineers × 12 months = 240 hours × $125/hour = $30,000

A modeled estimate with medium confidence. Swap in your own team size and loaded rate to size it for your team.

Engineering tools that address it

No engineering tool profile lists this error yet. Browse tools that connect to zudo-pd (Takazudo).

Evidence

  1. 1Takazudo/zudo-pd PR #274: Gate the PD15 supply-capability report and the P r3 correction contract in CIgithub.com

More recurring errors in zudo-pd (Takazudo)

See all 3 zudo-pd (Takazudo) errors

Sourced from public community reports. Costs and delays are modeled estimates, not measurements. Know a better source or a fix? Tell us at hello@productflo.io.